Models

Aihub Phi 4 vs GLM 5.2

Compare Aihub Phi 4 from Microsoft and GLM 5.2 from Z.AI on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

MicrosoftAihub Phi 4Z.AIGLM 5.2
Microsoft logo
Aihub Phi 4
Microsoft · text → text

Phi-4 is a state-of-the-art open model based on a combination of synthetic datasets, curated public domain website data, and acquired academic books and QA datasets. The approach aims to ensure that small, efficient models are trained using data focused on high quality and advanced reasoning.

Input$0.12 /M
Output$0.48 /M
36% off
Z.AI logo
GLM 5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.1268$0.7212 /M
Output$3.9438$2.524 /M
Cache read$0.2817$0.1803 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Aihub Phi 4
GLM 5.2
Input /M
$0.12
$1.1268$0.721236%
Output /M
$0.48
$3.9438$2.52436%
Cache read /M
-
$0.2817$0.180336%
Context length
16,400
1,000,000
Max output
16,400
128,000
Time to First Token
0.4 s
0.7 s
Throughput
46.2 tok/s
35.9 tok/s
Modalities
text
text
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
-
June 16, 2026

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

aihub-Phi-4glm-5.2

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

aihub-Phi-4glm-5.2

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
aihub-Phi-4glm-5.2
1180128013801480
Overall
12561472
Coding
13071509
Math
12651476
Hard prompts
12781492
Instruction following
12451465
Multi-turn
12421469
Creative writing
12101451
Longer query
12661482
Chinese
12671517
English
12721480

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Aihub Phi 4
$14.40 /mo
GLM 5.2
$127$81.13 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Aihub Phi 4, GLM 5.2?

Aihub Phi 4: $0.48/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $2.524/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

GLM 5.2: 1509; Aihub Phi 4: 1307 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Aihub Phi 4: 0.4s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Aihub Phi 4 accepts 16,400 and GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 16,400 tokens on Aihub Phi 4 and 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Aihub Phi 4 at 46.2 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 35.9 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Aihub Phi 4 accepts text input; GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call Aihub Phi 4 and GLM 5.2 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.