Models

GLM 5.2 vs Grok 4

Compare GLM 5.2 from Z.AI and Grok 4 from Grok on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

Z.AIGLM 5.2GrokGrok 4
36% off
Z.AI logo
GLM 5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.1268$0.7212 /M
Output$3.9438$2.524 /M
Cache read$0.2817$0.1803 /M
Grok logo
Grok 4
Grok · text, image → text

Grok, their latest and greatest flagship model, offers unparalleled performance in natural language, math, and reasoning – the perfect jack of all trades. The current pointing model version is grok-4-0709.

Input$3.3 /M
Output$16.5 /M
Cache read$0.825 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

GLM 5.2
Grok 4
Input /M
$1.1268$0.721236%
$3.3
Output /M
$3.9438$2.52436%
$16.5
Cache read /M
$0.2817$0.180336%
$0.825
Context length
1,000,000
256,000
Max output
128,000
64,000
Time to First Token
0.7 s
2.7 s
Throughput
35.9 tok/s
54.5 tok/s
Modalities
text
textimage
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
function callingstructured outputsthinking
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
June 16, 2026
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

glm-5.2grok-4

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

glm-5.2grok-4

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
glm-5.2grok-4
13801420146015001540
Overall
14101472
Coding
14361509
Math
14281476
Hard prompts
14201492
Instruction following
13971465
Multi-turn
14121469
Creative writing
13971451
Longer query
14171482
Chinese
14341517
English
14191480

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

GLM 5.2
$127$81.13 /mo
Grok 4
$446 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Grok 4?

GLM 5.2: $2.524/M output tokens; Grok 4: $16.5/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

GLM 5.2: 1509; Grok 4: 1436 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

GLM 5.2: 0.7s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Grok 4 accepts 256,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 64,000 tokens on Grok 4.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Grok 4 at 54.5 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 35.9 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Grok 4 accepts text and image input and supports function calling, structured outputs and thinking.

Can I call GLM 5.2 and Grok 4 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.