Models

GLM 5.2 vs Mistral Large 3

Compare GLM 5.2 from Z.AI and Mistral Large 3 from Mistral on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

Z.AIGLM 5.2MistralMistral Large 3
36% off
Z.AI logo
GLM 5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.1268$0.7212 /M
Output$3.9438$2.524 /M
Cache read$0.2817$0.1803 /M
Mistral logo
Mistral Large 3
Mistral · text, image → text

Mistral Large 3 is a MoE model with 67.5B total parameters and 41B active parameters, supporting a 256K-token context window. Trained from scratch on 3,000 NVIDIA H200 GPUs, it is one of the strongest permissively licensed open-weight models available. Designed for advanced reasoning and long-context understanding, Mistral Large 3 delivers performance on par with the best instruction-tuned open-weight models for general-purpose tasks, while also offering image understanding capabilities. Its multilingual strengths are particularly notable for non-English/Chinese languages, making it well-suited for global applications. Typical use cases include enterprise assistants, multilingual customer support, content generation and editing, data analysis over long documents, code assistance, and research workflows that require handling large corpora or complex instructions. With its MoE architecture, Mistral Large 3 balances strong performance with efficient inference, providing a versatile backbone for building reliable, production-grade AI systems.

Input$0.5 /M
Output$1.5 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

GLM 5.2
Mistral Large 3
Input /M
$1.1268$0.721236%
$0.5
Output /M
$3.9438$2.52436%
$1.5
Cache read /M
$0.2817$0.180336%
-
Context length
1,000,000
256,000
Max output
128,000
256,000
Time to First Token
0.7 s
1.7 s
Throughput
35.9 tok/s
47.2 tok/s
Modalities
text
textimage
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
function callingstructured outputs
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
June 16, 2026
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

glm-5.2mistral-large-3

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

glm-5.2mistral-large-3

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
glm-5.2mistral-large-3
1360142014801540
Overall
14161472
Coding
14681509
Math
14021476
Hard prompts
14321492
Instruction following
14041465
Multi-turn
14211469
Creative writing
13761451
Longer query
14171482
Chinese
14271517
English
14291480
WebDev Arena
glm-5.2mistral-large-3
1200132014401560
Overall
12241587
React
15991599
HTML
12301539
Gaming
16251625
Simulations
16121612
Data analytics
15431543

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Mistral Large 3
$52.50 /mo
GLM 5.2
$127$81.13 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Mistral Large 3?

Mistral Large 3: $1.5/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $2.524/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

GLM 5.2: 1509; Mistral Large 3: 1468 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

GLM 5.2: 0.7s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Mistral Large 3 accepts 256,000 input tokens. Maximum output per request is 128,000 tokens on GLM 5.2 and 256,000 tokens on Mistral Large 3.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Mistral Large 3 at 47.2 tok/s and GLM 5.2 at 35.9 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Mistral Large 3 accepts text and image input and supports function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call GLM 5.2 and Mistral Large 3 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.