Models

GLM 5.2 vs Solar Pro4

Compare GLM 5.2 from Z.AI and Solar Pro4 from Upstage on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

Z.AIGLM 5.2UpstageSolar Pro4
36% off
Z.AI logo
GLM 5.2
Z.AI · text → text

GLM-5.2 is Z.ai’s flagship model for the era of long-horizon tasks. With a truly usable 1M-token context window, it can handle project-level engineering context, execute long-running tasks more reliably, follow engineering standards more consistently, and complete the full development workflow from requirements to multi-platform deployment in a single task.

Input$1.1268$0.7212 /M
Output$3.9438$2.524 /M
Cache read$0.2817$0.1803 /M
75% off
Upstage logo
Solar Pro4
Upstage · text → text

Input$0.3$0.075 /M
Output$1.2$0.3 /M
Cache read$0.06$0.015 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

GLM 5.2
Solar Pro4
Input /M
$1.1268$0.721236%
$0.3$0.07575%
Output /M
$3.9438$2.52436%
$1.2$0.375%
Cache read /M
$0.2817$0.180336%
$0.06$0.01575%
Context length
1,000,000
524,288
Max output
128,000
0
Time to First Token
0.7 s
2.4 s
Throughput
35.9 tok/s
26.6 tok/s
Modalities
text
text
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
long context
API Formats
chat_completions · claude_api
Released
June 16, 2026
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

glm-5.2solar-pro4

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

glm-5.2solar-pro4

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
glm-5.2solar-pro4
1260134014201500
Overall
13771472
Coding
14471509
Math
14761476
Hard prompts
14051492
Instruction following
13621465
Multi-turn
13931469
Creative writing
12881451
Longer query
13831482
Chinese
15171517
English
14081480
WebDev Arena
glm-5.2solar-pro4
1340142015001580
Overall
13711587
React
13571599
HTML
13941539
Gaming
13561625
Simulations
13861612
Data analytics
13551543

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Solar Pro4
$36$9.00 /mo
GLM 5.2
$127$81.13 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: GLM 5.2, Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4: $0.3/M output tokens; GLM 5.2: $2.524/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

GLM 5.2: 1509; Solar Pro4: 1447 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

GLM 5.2: 0.7s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

GLM 5.2 accepts 1,000,000 and Solar Pro4 accepts 524,288 input tokens.

Which one generates tokens faster?

GLM 5.2 at 35.9 tok/s and Solar Pro4 at 26.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

GLM 5.2 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Solar Pro4 accepts text input and supports long context.

Can I call GLM 5.2 and Solar Pro4 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.