Models

Grok 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Compare Grok 4.5 from Grok and Muse Spark 1.1 from Meta on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

GrokGrok 4.5MetaMuse Spark 1.1
Grok logo
Grok 4.5
Grok · text, image → text

Grok 4.5 was trained on datasets spanning knowledge in coding, science, engineering, and math. With both intelligent and efficient reasoning, Grok 4.5 excels at real engineering tasks and exceeds comparable leading models at these tasks.

Input$2 /M
Output$6 /M
Cache read$0.5 /M
Meta logo
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta · text, image, audio, video → text

Muse Spark 1.1 is a multimodal reasoning model from Meta, built for agentic tasks. It accepts text, images, video, audio, and PDF documents and returns text, with a 1M-token context window.

Input$1.375 /M
Output$4.675 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Grok 4.5
Muse Spark 1.1
Input /M
$2
$1.375
Output /M
$6
$4.675
Cache read /M
$0.5
-
Context length
500,000
1,000,000
Max output
500,000
0
Time to First Token
2.8 s
1.9 s
Throughput
31.6 tok/s
125.1 tok/s
Modalities
textimage
textimageaudiovideo
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputslong context
thinkingtools
API Formats
Released
July 2026
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

grok-4.5muse-spark-1.1

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

grok-4.5muse-spark-1.1

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
grok-4.5muse-spark-1.1
1420146015001540
Overall
14711492
Coding
15231531
Math
14791490
Hard prompts
14951511
Instruction following
14661470
Multi-turn
14761494
Creative writing
14451451
Longer query
14791487
Chinese
15121534
English
14761492
Vision
grok-4.5muse-spark-1.1
12601280130013201340
Overall
12791282
OCR
12921294
Diagram
13041319
Homework
12761324
WebDev Arena
grok-4.5muse-spark-1.1
1500154015801620
Overall
15411556
React
15301559
HTML
15441571
Gaming
15441589
Simulations
15531585
Data analytics
15211537

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

Muse Spark 1.1
$153 /mo
Grok 4.5
$210 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Grok 4.5, Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1: $4.675/M output tokens; Grok 4.5: $6/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Muse Spark 1.1: 1531; Grok 4.5: 1523 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

Muse Spark 1.1: 1.9s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

How large is each context window?

Grok 4.5 accepts 500,000 and Muse Spark 1.1 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens.

Which one generates tokens faster?

Muse Spark 1.1 at 125.1 tok/s and Grok 4.5 at 31.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Grok 4.5 accepts text and image input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling, structured outputs and long context; Muse Spark 1.1 accepts text, image, audio and video input and supports thinking and tool calling.

Can I call Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1 with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.